November 13, 2003 ☼ Foreign Affairs
- Pakistani Information Minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmad asked India on Wednesday to stop asking for 20 people it lists as its fugitives. “If you talk of lists, we shall also have to look into our own, some of which are extremely old,†he said referring to cases such as a first information report lodged against Indian Deputy Prime Minister LK Advani at a Karachi police station in 1947 for planning to assassinate Pakistani leaders. It is for the first time that a Pakistani minister has openly raised the issue of Mr Advani to force India to stop demanding from Pakistan extradition of fugitives including Mumbai’s don Dawood Ibrahim who, according to Indian press reports, has shifted his base to Islamabad.The Daily Times.
This is an archived blog post from The Acorn.
Is it with people like this that India wants to have a dialogue? It is understandable if Pakistan wants to be unapologetic and firm with respect to its negotiating position on Kashmir. But it continues to be unapologetic with respect to the terrorist means it has employed. Harbouring Dawood Ibrahim and Masood Azhar for example are criminal offences and the regrouping of jehadis in Pakistan is an international terorist threat. The least you would expect from a Pakistan which is sincere and ready for a ‘give-and-take’ negotiation is a signal that Musharraf would be willing to jettison its terrorist baggage. But there is no such signal. In its absence it would be a monumental folly to begin any sort of serious dialogue or discussion with Pakistan. Sheikh Rashid should be told in no uncertain terms that he cannot expect to score any points by (at least initially) praising Vajpayee and demonising Advani.
The confidence building measures were unnecessary too, and have almost certainly been seen by Pakistan as a sign of Indian weakness under US pressure.
Update: Strangely, Reuters seems to have bought the Pakistani pitch that this is a ‘charm offensive’. LOL
© Copyright 2003-2024. Nitin Pai. All Rights Reserved.